Old Fitzgerald Bottled-in-Bond, Spring 2021 edition

I’d like to thank Heaven Hill for providing this review sample with no strings attached.

It’s that time of year. Apple has finally made an update to its Mac lineup* that has me ready to pull the trigger on replacing my old 2015 MacBook Pro. The thing still runs like a champ, but it is starting to show its age. I never use the laptop anywhere other than my desk so I don’t really need it as a laptop. Which means I’m free to completely reimagine my current office setup. Everything from storage to backups to displays and sound is on the table. For a gadget person like me, it’s a fun time. And one that only comes around every half decade or so.

And while I’m perusing spec sheets and pricing to help me decide between a colorful new iMac or a tiny Mac Mini, I’ll be sipping on a little something that comes out much more often. Tonight I am looking at the Spring 2021 edition of Old Fitzgerald Bottled in Bond, the half yearly special release from Heaven Hill. This edition clocks in at “only” 8 years old, which is nice because the suggested price reflects that lower age.

Old Fitzgerald Bottled in Bond, Spring 2021

Purchase Info: This sample was sent to me by Heaven Hill for review purposes. The suggested retail price is $85 for a 750 mL bottle.

Price per Drink (50 mL): $5.67

Details: 8 years old. 50% ABV.

Nose: Strong cinnamon notes, mint, oak, and almond.

Mouth: Nice, thick mouthfeel. Sweet, but not overly so. Notes of almond, cinnamon, oak, mint, and caramel.

Finish: Medium length and warm. Lingering notes of Cinnamon, caramel, and cocoa.

Thoughts: This is very good, as usual. I am really enjoying the thick, rich mouthfeel. The sweet notes of caramel and cocoa are well balanced by the spicy cinnamon. If you see this anywhere near the retail price, and can swing it, I'd recommend grabbing it. It's quite good. And don’t be scared off by the lower age statement. I tried it next to the Fall 2020 edition and I think I like this one better. Both were very caramel forward, but Spring 2021 had more spice to it. Which I tend to like more than the well-integrated oak notes that the previous edition had.

Ok. Off to play IT planning guy. Wish me luck!

*I’m a Designer/Photographer/Artist who got rid of his last PC in 2001 and has been happily using Macs since before I graduated college 20 years ago. I’m too old to relearn Windows and I like MacOS so no wise guy comments. Lol.

Bottom-Shelf Brackets 2021: The Championship Rounds

Well, here we are again. Once again we’ve nearly made it to the end of the Bottom-Shelf Brackets competition. I hope everyone was playing along. And if not, that you’ve had enough of these to play along in your mind. It really is a fun exercise each year to sit down and pit inexpensive bourbons against each other. I say inexpensive instead of “bad” because there isn’t one of these that will be dumped out when this is done. I will use every one in some way or another. Either neat on its own, in a cocktail, or even as the base of a blend. They are all good bourbons, some are just better than others in my opinion. You’re welcome to form your own opinions as to whether I’m right.

But anyway, let’s get on to round two and see who advances. Both of these matchups feature a 1-seed versus a 2-seed. There haven’t been any upsets so far. Let’s see if that continues.

Round 2a: Whiskey 1 (Ezra Brooks) vs. Whiskey 2 (Evan Williams)

Thoughts: Very similar on the nose. Both are decent on the mouth. Vibrant cinnamon spice in each. The finish of #1 shows peanut where #2 Shows a zesty spice. #2 wins on the strength of a nicer and tastier finish.

Round 2b: Whiskey 1 (Very Old Barton) vs. Whiskey 2 (Wild Turkey)

Thoughts: Once again the nose on each of these is similar with only slight differences to delicate notes. So the nose is a push. #1 has a nice mouthfeel with citrusy notes to go with the spicy notes. #2 was a little thin at first with a blossom of flavor after a few seconds in the mouth. Lots of baking spice notes in that blossoming. The finish is nice on both this time. I think I need to go with #2, but it is really close.

View fullsize

I’m not going to lie, I was very surprised to find out that Wild Turkey and Evan Wiliams won their rounds. As I stated above, we hadn’t had an upset yet and it was surprising to find not one, but two when all of the names were revealed at the end. I was especially surprised that the lower proof entry won each time.

Let’s see who our winner is.

Championship Round: Whiskey 1 (Evan Williams) vs. Whiskey 2 (Wild Turkey)

Whiskey #1: Mint, cinnamon, citrus zest. Not too hot, but not bland. Tasty finish.

Whiskey #2: Sweeter. Brown sugar, baking spices. Spicier but a little rough in its spice by comparison.

Winner: #1 wins this one. Once again very close but #1 has a touch more complexity.

View fullsize

If you could have seen my face as we revealed which alphanumeric code was which bourbon, you wold have laughed. I went into this fully expecting Very Old Barton to win. I mean it had won previously, right? The fact that it didn’t even make it out of Round 2 caused my jaw to drop. And it dropped even further when I saw it had been beaten by one that I said probably wouldn’t win against stiffer competition just the round prior.

But the biggest shock of all was Evan Williams winning it all. I know that a lot of you saw that coming. But I certainly didn’t. Which is weird since I know that Evan Williams is good bourbon. Due to the nature of the need for content on the site, I almost never buy it. But it is good stuff. And super inexpensive as well. It just goes to show that even those of us who have been tasting bourbon for a lot of years have our biases and preconceived notions.

And to be honest, it is fitting that Evan Williams won. I started this series of posts talking about “Finding Joy in the Ordinary.” And Evan Williams could be the patron saint of ordinary bourbon. Notice I said ordinary, not bad, bourbon. Evan Williams is good, plentiful, inexpensive and available in multiple styles and proof levels. I couldn’t have planned a more thematically accurate winner. I think that’s pretty cool.

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

Bottom-Shelf Brackets 2021: Round 1: Evan Williams vs. Jim Beam

What a cool matchup we have in store tonight. We are featuring the world’s top two selling bourbons by volume (if you set aside that one from Tennessee that doesn’t want to be called a bourbon). Jim Beam is the world’s top-selling bourbon and Evan Williams is right behind them at number two. I didn’t plan this, it was luck of the seeding that set these two titans against each other, but that doesn’t mean that I wasn’t super excited once I realized it.

First up is our number two seed for Division One. Coming in at 86 proof and looking so good in black, please welcome: Evan Williams!

And its opponent is the number one selling bourbon across the world. Behemoth barely begins to describe this white-labeled giant, please welcome: Jim Beam!

Reminder, all of the competitions this year were tasted blind and we knew the winner of the competition prior to any reveal. Notes, thoughts, and conclusions were all from before we knew what was what. Needless to say, some of my conclusions were surprising to me. Tasting notes may be a little unusual since they were being tasted at the same time and could have influenced the perceptions of one another.

Whiskey 1 (Evan Williams)

Purchase Info: $12.99 for a 1-liter bottle, Total Wine, Burnsville, MN

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $0.65

Details: 43% ABV.

Nose: Spearmint, caramel, and nutmeg.

Mouth: Caramel, mint, cinnamon candies.

Finish: Shorter side of medium. Notes of cinnamon and peanut butter cookies.

Thoughts:  Not bad. Not bad at all. Classic value bourbon flavor profile.

Whiskey 2 (Jim Beam)

Purchase Info: $13.99 for a 750 mL bottle, Total Wine, Burnsville, MN

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $0.93

Details: 40% ABV.

Nose: Peanut, caramel, green vegetables.

Mouth: Thin mouthfeel. Caramel and cinnamon.

Finish: Medium length and warm. Peanuts and dried grains.

Thoughts: Even blind, I think I know what this is. The distinctive peanut note gives it away. though considering at least half of the participants are made by-or source from- Beam, I am fully prepared to be wrong. I like the finish, the mouth leaves a bit to be desired and I'm ambivalent regarding the nose.

Winner: I like the finish on #2 better but I prefer the nose and mouth on #1. #1 wins.

View fullsize

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

8th Annual BourbonGuy.com Bottom-Shelf Brackets: The "Find Joy in the Ordinary" Edition

I like to use a Chrome plugin called Momentum as a home screen for my instance of the Chrome browser. It has a new pretty photo every day. It tells me the time, local weather, and helps me with my to-do list. Recently it started showing “Mantras” below the time. I found the one pictured above to be particularly meaningful. “Find Joy in the Ordinary.”

It’s sometimes hard to do as a bourbon lover, finding joy in the ordinary. The entire purpose of a site like this is to give people a sense of what is new and exciting. Even if it is only new and exciting to me. So, this year I’ve made a commitment to myself to step back a little and to do what the computer screen told me to do. Find Joy in the Ordinary.

And, perfect timing, it’s time for the Bottom Shelf Bourbon Brackets again. Maybe it is just me, but I haven’t heard a lot of talk about the NCAA tournament this year…and I’m fully willing to admit that it may be because my beloved Golden Gophers were bad enough this year that the coach was fired at the end of the season. I might just be hiding from any news that has to do with the yearly basketball tournament.

Of course, as long-time readers know, I don’t really like basketball anyway. In fact, this series was started eight years ago as a way to play along with all the folks around me filling out their brackets, while not caring about basketball.

In recent years, I’ve gotten caught up in the excitement of more “interesting” bourbons. Two years ago, I decided to let the readers choose who participated. Last year, I threw out the concept of “Bottom-Shelf” entirely. But this year, following the advice of the computer screen, I’ve decided to find joy in the ordinary. And as such, I’m going old-school on this one. Back to the original rules. Back to some really “ordinary” bourbons. Things that would have been participants from the first few years before I started messing with the rules.

Here are the rules:

1. In keeping with the theme, it had to be “ordinary.” No Single barrel, no small batch. No Bottled in Bond. Anything that might be used to call something special was thrown out. This is for true entry-level bourbons.

2. The original rules stated that it had to be under $15 for a 750 mL bottle or under $20 for a liter bottle. I decided to keep that.

3. The original rules also stated that entries had to be Straight Bourbon Whiskey. I saw no reason to change that.

4. Participants were seeded based on proof and then age. Higher proof equals a higher seeding. If you stated a bourbon’s age when you didn’t have to, you got a nod over those, at the same proof, who didn’t. If you stated a bourbon’s age because you were young enough that the law required it, someone else got the nod over you.

5. These were tasted blind. I had no idea what each of the participants was when I tasted them. I poured 200mL bottles of each bourbon. I labeled them with an alphanumeric code and then filled out an initial bracket with those codes. Until we were finished I never saw the bracket or the bottles that were being poured again. My wife (who didn’t know which code corresponded to each bourbon) poured each round and filled out the winners in secret.

So, let’s meet the 2021 competition, shall we? Coming in at the number one overall seed is Ezra Brooks from Lux Row Distillery. This seeding comes down to proof, at 90 proof, this was the highest proof bourbon in the competition. They will initially match up against number four seed, Benchmark Bourbon from Buffalo Trace. At only “36 months” and 80 proof, this was the lowest seed in the competition. Rounding out Division One is a matchup between Heaven Hill’s Evan Williams Black Label and BeamSuntory’s Jim Beam White Label. Due to being 86 proof, Evan Williams was the second seed and due to stating its age, Jim Beam White gets the nod over other 80 proof offerings to take the first number three seed.

Over in Division Two, we have Very Old Barton (86 proof) from the Barton 1792 Distillery as the number one seed. They match up against Beam Suntory’s number four seed Old Grand Dad (80 Proof). In the second matchup, we have number two seed Wild Turkey (81 proof) against number three seed Rebel Yell from Lux Row.

This should be fun. Let’s go find joy in ordinary bourbon. So who’ve you got? Let everyone know down in the comments.

View fullsize

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

Larceny Barrel Proof, Batch A121

I’d like to thank Heaven Hill for providing this review sample with no strings attached.

View fullsize

It’s funny how our tastes develop. There was a time in my bourbon journey that a bottle of 80 proof Ancient Age or Cabin Still was right in line with my preferred flavor profile. These days it is only the rare sub-90 proof bottle that gets me coming back for more. Somehow along the way, I’ve started to enjoy higher-proof whiskeys. I’ve decided that I really enjoy being able to put a cube of ice in there and still have something robust to enjoy.

And I’m not the only one to notice a change in my palate. My wife has also noticed a slight change over the years. Of the two of us, she is the fan of wheated bourbons in our house. I’ll drink them, but I usually prefer the “normal” bourbon that uses rye as a flavoring grain. When Larceny came out, it was her favorite bourbon. Super easy to find, affordable, and lined up exactly with her palate. These days, however, she finds herself drawn to other bourbons both wheated and not.

Yet even with that, we’ve both been big fans of the Larceny releases so far. I like the higher proof and more concentrated flavors. She likes the more robust version of the Larceny flavor profile (maybe this more concentrated version has ruined the 92 proof for her?). In fact, this is what we said about the last batch:

This typifies exactly what my wife wants in a bourbon: sweet and oaky with lots of caramel. She wants it on the record that if she sees this, and if it is allowed, she wants to buy two bottles. I also really like it in case you were curious.

Let’s see how 2021’s first batch compares.

Larceny Barrel Proof, Batch A121

Purchase info: This was graciously provided by Heaven Hill for review purposes. The suggested retail price is $49.99.

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $3.33

Details: Batch number: A121. 57.4% ABV. "Made from a mingling of 6 to 8-year-old bourbon." Non-chill filtered.

Nose: Oak, toffee, mint, baking spices, and fleeting hints of dark chocolate.

Mouth: Follows the nose with oak, dark chocolate, caramel, and baking spices.

Finish: Warm and medium length. Notes of dark chocolate, oak, and baking spices linger.

Thoughts: The one word I can think of for this is "Robust" It has a great mouthfeel and the dark chocolate notes are fantastic for a lover of dark chocolate like me. I like this more than the Elijah Craig Barrel Proof we looked at last week.

Comparison with the last batch: C920 was way sweeter on the nose showing much more caramel to A121's dominant oak notes. The sweeter notes of C920 continue on the mouth bringing added heat to the party as well. A121 has a thicker mouthfeel and more oak and cocoa notes. Overall, these are quite different and which you like more will depend on whether you prefer hot and sweet caramel flavors or robust with oak flavors. In my opinion, they are the two best batches of the four released so far. I think I like A121 better, my wife likes C920 better.

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

Parker's Heritage Collection 2020: Heavy Char Bourbon

I’d like to thank Heaven Hill for providing this review sample with no strings attached.

View fullsize

So I got my COVID test back. Turns out I’m negative for COVID and am just sick with a helluva cold. Very happy about that. Especially since that means that I hopefully won’t be losing my sense of smell or taste. Both of which are super useful for tasting whiskey. Luckily I had a backlog of tasting notes that I’ve been working through posting that should, hopefully, cover me until I can get back to tasting whiskey in a critical manner.

For now, I guess I’ll just have to drink it in a medicinal manner. Did anyone get a prescription for me?

Tonight’s set of tasting notes is for the sample of Parker’s Heritage that Heaven Hill was nice enough to send me. It’s the 14th release in the series which is named for former Master Distiller Parker Beam, who sadly passed back in 2017. Like every release going back to 2013, some of the proceeds from this year’s bottling will be going toward ALS research.

This year’s release features Heaven Hill’s traditional bourbon mash bill of 78% corn, 12% malted barley, and 10% Rye. It was aged for 10 years in “heavy char” barrels (Level 5 char) on the sixth floor of Warehouse Y. There were 102 barrels in the batch. The suggested retail price is $120.

Parker's Heritage Collection 2020: Heavy Char Bourbon

Purchase info: This was graciously provided by Heaven Hill for review purposes. The suggested retail price is $120.00.

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $8.00

Details: 60% ABV. Mash bill: 78% corn, 12% malted barley, and 10% Rye. 10 years old. Level 5 char. Aged on the sixth floor of Warehouse Y. 102 barrel batch.

Nose: Vanilla, oak, caramel, and cocoa powder.

Mouth: Nice and spicy with cinnamon, caramel, vanilla, chocolate, and just a hint of mint.

Finish: Warm and on the longer side of medium length. Lingering sweet notes of cinnamon, caramel, leather, and mint.

Thoughts: This is just straight-up good bourbon. There are no gimmicks, just the flavors that made us all fall in love with bourbon. The flavors I would list if you asked me to describe bourbon to a novice: caramel, vanilla, cinnamon, spice, a nice burn, and some dark chocolate and leather for depth. I really like it.

With water: This is 120° proof so I should probably add some water to see how it reacts. Water really brings out the caramel on the nose. It reduces some of the richer notes in the mouth allowing the drier and spicier notes to shine. Personally, I'm thinking I prefer this neat.

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

Larceny Barrel Proof C920

I’d like to thank Heaven Hill for providing this review sample with no strings attached.

View fullsize

Soooo…need a drink yet? Welcome to Election Day: Day Three and, at least as of the time of writing, we are no closer to knowing which fifty-ish percent of the population is going to get what they want. And if that isn’t reason enough to reach for a drink, realize that we might set a modern record for voter turnout as a percentage of the eligible population and still have about one-third of the eligible population not vote. That’s nuts to me, but then I live in a state with some of the highest voter turnout percentages in the last few elections.

Anyway, I hope your super-old white guy wins…unless you didn’t vote for my super-old white guy.

Tonight’s bourbon is the third batch of Larceny Barrel Proof, a cask strength version of Heaven Hill’s flagship wheated bourbon brand. The first two batches were extremely hot so much so that it prompted me to write the following for batch B520.

Wow! That's a hot one! This screams for water. And it doesn't suffer from even the addition of a fairly substantial splash. In fact, after trying a couple of different dilution levels, I think my favorite was 100° proof. Water brings out the sweet notes of caramel and brown sugar, tames the heat, transforms the individual spice notes on the mouth and finish into a more generic "baking spice" note, and allows the oak notes to move more to the forefront of the experience.

Let’s see if this trend continues.

Larceny Barrel Proof, Batch C920

Purchase info: This was graciously provided by Heaven Hill for review purposes. The suggested retail price is $49.99.

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $3.33

Details: Batch number: C920. 61.2% ABV

Nose: This is like a caramel drenched sugar cookie on the nose. Strong notes of caramel and vanilla with light baking spices.

Mouth: Warm with caramel, cinnamon, oak, and a touch of apple.

Finish: Warm and long with lingering notes of cinnamon and caramel.

Thoughts: Good news, this isn’t nearly as hot as the last two have been. In fact, I just realized that my, admittedly tiny, pour that I’ve been having while I wrote tonight didn’t have any water in it at all. Huh, at 122.4° proof, maybe it being that drinkable isn’t great news.

This typifies exactly what my wife wants in a bourbon: sweet and oaks with lots of caramel. She wants it on the record that if she sees this, and it is allowed, she wants to buy two bottles. I also really like it in case you were curious.

Comparison with the last batch: C920 is much sweeter and caramel forward on the nose. B520 is much more spice forward and nutty on the mouth whereas C920 is sweeter and rounder, showing a lot more caramel. And of course, there are the previously mentioned relative levels of mouth burning.

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

Elijah Craig Barrel Proof, Batch C920

I’d like to thank Heaven Hill for providing this review sample with no strings attached.

View fullsize

As I was getting ready to write this tonight, I remembered that one of my local liquor stores had Elijah Craig Barrel Proof for $58 or so the last time I was there and made the decision that I was going to get one. I made the bold declaration that batch B520 was my favorite yet when I reviewed it back in May. And even though I had already done a comparison tasting of B520 and C920, I wanted one more chance to compare them.

But when I arrived, wouldn’t you know it, the shelf was empty. This is why you don’t wait when you see something you want, especially for a price that good. Ah well. I’ll just have to console myself with C920. I mean, it’s probably pretty good too, right?

Elijah Craig Barrel Proof, Batch C920

Purchase info: This sample was graciously provided by Heaven Hill for review purposes. Locally Elijah Craig Barrel Proof sells for as low as $64.99 for a 750 mL bottle when not on sale.

Price per Drink (50 mL): $4.33

Details: 66.4% ABV, 12 years old

Nose: Brown sugar, dark chocolate, a nutty note, and a hint of mint.

Mouth: Thick and rich. Very spicy due to the proof. Lots of "tingle" on this one. Caramel, cinnamon, chocolate, roasted nuts, mint, and oak.

Finish: Medium and warm. Lingering chocolate, mint, and oak.

With Water: Caramel bomb on the nose. Really tames the heat, but amps up the mint in the mouth. still a lot of cocoa and caramel.

Comparison with B520: C920 is much sweeter than B520 on the nose and mouth. Really enjoying the more prominent cocoa notes.

Thoughts: Delicious! As much as I enjoyed the last release (and I gave it a rare Heart rating), when I tasted them side by side, I liked this one even more. I'm loving the cocoa/chocolate notes mixed with cinnamon and caramel. It tastes like an alcoholic chocolate cookie. Big fan! I guess it is ok that I “have” to “console myself” with the C920

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.