9th Annual BourbonGuy.com Bottom-Shelf Bourbon Brackets: 2022 Championship Rounds

Welcome back, folks! We come now to the end of the 2022 contest. Eight bourbons entered the arena. Four have fallen by the wayside. There have been some delicious treats and there have been some real stinkers. Let’s see how it all ends and see if we’ve learned anything along the way. First, we have the Round Two matchups.

Division 1: Arctic Mama (Evan Williams Bottled in Bond) vs Giant Charmer (Four Roses)

Thoughts: Giant Charmer has a nicer nose. Nothing wrong with Arctic Mama, but Giant Charmer is fruity and creamy which I really like in a bourbon. Arctic Mama is spicy on the mouth with notes of caramel and vanilla. Giant Charmer is spicy on the mouth with notes of mint and fruit. Arctic Mama has a nicer finish, showing lots of baking spice. Arctic Mama (Evan Williams Bottled in Bond) advances on the strength of that lovely finish.

Division 2: Fire Pirate (Banker's Club) vs. Quark Juggler (Evan Williams 1783)

Thoughts: The nose on Fire Pirate initially presented more grain notes and Quark Juggler initially presented more spice, but after a moment they both settled in and became very similar. Fire Pirate has a thinner mouthfeel and shows more grains notes. Quark Juggler is spicier and sweeter with a nicer mouthfeel and finish. Quark Juggler (Evan Williams 1783) advances to the Championship. Nothing wrong with Fire Pirate though. Nothing at all.

Championship Round: Quark Juggler (Evan Williams 1783) vs. Arctic Mama (Evan Williams Bottled in Bond)

The noses are very similar with Quark Juggler being slightly mintier while Arctic Mama is slightly fruitier. Arctic Mama is fruity and spicy on the mouth. Quark Juggler shows a lot of baking spice and some mint on the mouth. Arctic Mama wins a squeaker. It is a very well-rounded bourbon whereas Quark Juggler seems more focused on the spice. Both are very tasty and either would be an easy winner against other competition.

Congrats to Arctic Mama! Evan Williams Bottled in Bond is the 2022 Bottom-Shelf Champion!

View fullsize

Lessons Learned:

This was an interesting contest for me. When I decided to set myself the restriction to only include bourbons that were sold by the handle and only for less than $35, I eliminated a lot of the usual candidates. There was nothing from Buffalo Trace, Sazerac did have one entry in Colonel Lee, but it certainly isn’t one of their best offerings. Beam only offered Old Crow in the price/format needed for this contest. All their Jim Beam branded offerings were too pricy in this market. Same with Wild Turkey. Usually I’d be able to at least get the 81 proof release, but it was not in stock at the stores that carry it at a low enough price.

All that left me scrambling to fill four slots. I was in the process of rethinking this crazy plan—which I really only implemented because I found a handle of the new 1783 on sale for $29.99 and I wanted all the bottles the same size so the photos would look better—when I wandered into Total Wine and decided that I could probably take a look at a few items that I really could only find there. So I ended up with four contestants that I’d never before included in the contest and three that I’d never even tasted before. That kind of thing is fun for me. At least before the first sips.

So what did I learn about each of these?

With Evan Williams Bottled in Bond and Evan Williams 1783 meeting in the Championship, they prove once again that if you are looking for inexpensive bourbon, grab a Heaven Hill product. You have the best odds of getting something really tasty for not a lot of money with them.

Four Roses finally got out of the first round on their fourth try. I really like their “Beige Label” standard bourbon, but when you put it head to head with other products in the price range they are hampered by their signature mellowness. On it’s own? Delicious. But put it against a Bonded bourbon and it just can’t compete. You better believe that I’m still going to finish the handle though.

McFarlane’s Reserve lost in the only upset. And that was a huge surprise for me. For the price, I expected more. I honestly don’t understand the description that it got from my buddy Fred Minnick. In a completely blind tasting, I thought it was the worst thing in the contest. It pains me to dump a $35 handle, but there is now way this is going back in my mouth. I even liked the TerrePURE entry better.

And speaking of the TerrePURE entry, let’s skip ahead to Winchester. This was one that I hesitated on including. It claims to be a straight bourbon, but much like the conversation around flavored bourbons and their status as even being a bourbon, does the TerrePURE process constitute “flavoring” (thus disqualifying it as even being a bourbon, much less a straight bourbon)? But then, I figured I was overthinking things. If they got it approved as straight bourbon, and they want to compete with straight bourbons, then who am I to let keep them out of a silly little contest on a small whiskey blog? To the surprise of no one in this house, when the winners of each contest were revealed, Winchester didn’t make it out of the first round. It was just too unpleasant, minty and…weird.

I learned nothing from Old Crow. The last time I included it in the contest, I stated that I would never buy it again…I should have stuck with that philosophy because I’m probably dumping this bottle too. When I said: “if you had never had bourbon, had it described for you by someone who didn't like it, and then tried to make a bourbon using only their description as a guide, you would make this bourbon” I think I was being generous.

As long as we are on the topic of bottles to be dumped, let’s look at Colonel Lee. I like bourbons from Barton. I like all of their flagships. Very Old Barton and 1792 are very tasty bourbons. But Colonel Lee is just bad. Not as bad as Mc Farlane’s Reserve or Old Crow, but not much better either. At least Colonel Lee tastes like bourbon, bad bourbon, but still bourbon. It might taste like the bourbon you take multiple rounds of shots of just before bar close, but that is still bourbon. Old Crow merely resembled bourbon and McFarlane’s Reserve tasted like buttered raisins…that’s not a bourbon flavor.

So now the final, and the most surprising, contestant: Banker’s Club Bourbon. Banker’s Club is a line of spirits sold by Laird’s (the AppleJack people). It has gin, vodka, bourbon, etc in the line. Think of it like a Seagram’s, Mr. Boston, or Fleischmann’s line. Some of everything, none of it high-end enough to be worthy of its own brand name. Banker’s Club was the least expensive entry in the contest. In fact, it is the least expensive entry in the nine years we have been doing this contest. You’d have to round up to make one cent per milliliter. That’s a very inexpensive bourbon. And it’s decent. Not like, drink- it-neat-in-a-Glencairn decent. But certainly throw-it-in-a-whiskey-sour or use-it-with-coke decent. Heck I won’t be dumping the bottle. I’ll probably mix it with higher proof and more flavorful bourbons to make them last longer. I’m super impressed with this one.

Overall this was a fun contest. It ended up right about where I would have guessed and I got a few surprises along the way. And heck I even like trying bad bourbon once in a while. It’s fun to know what not to buy too. Though, with three of dumpable bourbons in the mix this time around, I’m thinking that I’ll be happy to switch to tasting the top-shelf Barton and Heaven Hill samples that have been stacking up while the contest has been running.

Once again congrats to Heaven Hill and their Arctic Mama, Evan Williams Bottled in Bond!

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

Bottom-Shelf Brackets 2022: Round 1: Banker's Club Bourbon vs. McFarlane's Reserve

Tonight we feature a match-up of bourbons that I have never had before tasting them blind. One is the most expensive bottle in the competition and the other is the least expensive bottle. Should be fun.

First up is our number two seed for Division Two. Coming in at 90° proof, this bourbon is created by the secretive IJW Whiskey company. It is competing under the name Hamburger Advocate, please welcome: McFarlane’s Reserve!

And its opponent, coming in at 80° proof, this bourbon is produced by the Laird’s company (of Apple Jack fame), please welcome: Banker’s Club Bourbon!

Reminder, all of the competitions this year were tasted blind and we knew the winner of the competition prior to any reveal. Notes, thoughts, and conclusions were all from before we knew what was what. Needless to say, some of my conclusions were surprising to me. Tasting notes may be a little unusual since they were being tasted at the same time and could have influenced the perceptions of one another.

Fire Pirate (Banker's Club)

Purchase Info: $16.99 for a 1.75-liter bottle, Total Wine, Burnsville, MN

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $0.49

Details: 40% ABV. Aged 3 Years.

Nose: Caramel, lots of vanilla, and a baking spice blend.

Mouth: Caramel, vanilla, honey, and a hint of oak.

Finish: Medium in both length and warmth. Notes of honey, toasted bread, and mint.

Thoughts:  This is actually quite pleasant.

Hamburger Arcade (McFarlane's Reserve)

Purchase Info: $34.99 for a 1.75-liter bottle, Viking Liquor Barrel, Prior Lake, MN

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $1.00

Details: 45% ABV. Aged for a minimum of three years.

Nose: Buttered popcorn, white wine, and spearmint.

Mouth: This tastes like buttered raisins.

Finish: Mercifully short. Follows the mouth very faithfully.

Thoughts: I've only tasted something this bad once. Hopefully I never taste anything this bad again.

Winner: Fire Pirate wins big. Hamburger Arcade is the worst thing in round 1. Thankfully we are now on to round 2 and I can put all this behind me. Banker’s Club advances to Round 2.

View fullsize

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

Bottom-Shelf Brackets 2022: Round 1: Evan Williams 1783 vs. Winchester

Here we go! Let’s get down to the competitions. I hope that you guys are as excited by this as I am. Round 1 of the 2022 BourbonGuy.com Bottom-Shelf Brackets opens with Division 2 Number 1 seed Evan Williams 1783 versus Number 4 seed Winchester. 

These are two newcomers to the contest, at least in their current forms. Evan Williams 1783 recently went through a reformulation that gave it a proof bump. And for its opponent, well, I’ve never allowed a TerrePURE product in previously. In fact, I almost disqualified Winchester right up to the moment of our tasting because of the TerrePURE process. But then, I remembered that TerrePURE claimed early on that they were not trying to make high-end bourbons, but were instead looking to compete with budget whiskeys. In that case, then there was no contest they belong in more.

So, first up is the small-batch version of the number two selling bourbon in the country. Looking good in its svelte new outfit, and competing under the name Quark Juggler, we have Evan Williams 1783!

And their opponent is a collaboration between Total Wine and TerrePURE. Aged for two years before being subjected to fancy scientific processes, please welcome Winchester Bourbon!

All of the competitions this year were tasted blind and we knew the winner of the competition prior to any reveal. Notes, thoughts, and conclusions were all from before we knew what was what. Needless to say, some of my conclusions were surprising to me. Tasting notes may be a little unusual since they were being tasted at the same time and could have influenced the perceptions of one another.

Quark Juggler (Evan Williams 1783)

Purchase Info: $29.99 for a 1.75-liter bottle, MGM Wine & Spirits, Burnsville, MN

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $0.86

Details: 45% ABV.

Nose: Mint, orange, cinnamon, and a dusty note.

Mouth: Cinnamon candies, oak, and honey.

Finish: Warm and of medium length. Notes of oak and cinnamon.

Thoughts:  Warm with lots of spicy baking spices. Tasty.

Horse Jacket (Winchester)

Purchase Info: $34.97 for a 1.75-liter bottle, MGM Wine & Spirits, Burnsville, MN

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $1.00

Details: 45% ABV. Aged 2 years.

Nose: Wintergreen, caramel, vanilla, and almond.

Mouth: Smokey brown sugar and wintergreen.

Finish: Robust and kinda bitter. Very perfumey.

Thoughts: It's a minty bourbon. some people love those, some hate them. I'm mostly ok with them. This one however just feels off somehow. It's as if all the pieces for a tasty bourbon are there, they were just put together in the wrong order.

Winner: I feel like this had the opportunity to be a very close matchup. Because there is so much inconsistency at the lowest end of the price scale, we often get a powerfully flavored 90° proof versus an 80° proof that is thin and watery. But not here. Both of these were full-flavored, robust bourbons. The problem was in the nature of that robust flavor. Horse Junkie was so minty that it felt just weird in the mouth. Very reminiscent of Pepto-Bismol. Just way too overpowering on the wintergreen note.

Quark Juggler doesn't so much win this as Horse Jacket loses it. Quark Juggler or Evan Williams 1783 is advancing to round 2.

View fullsize

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

9th Annual BourbonGuy.com Bottom-Shelf Brackets: The Handles (Without Handles) Edition

Arctic Mama versus Sonic Berry? Quark Juggler versus Horse Jacket? Hamburger Arcade?

Eric, have you lost your damn fool mind? What kind of nonsense are you spewing?

Well, I thought that this year I’d give you a peek behind the curtain as to how we do these brackets every year. We used to do an entire convoluted routine so that we could both have a blind tasting. It involved people leaving the room. Pieces of paper. Cyphers. It was very confusing, and if you made a mistake (or just needed more whiskey to help you make a decision) there was no way to recreate what happened.

But nowadays, we have an ever so simple process. I seed the whiskey in the bracket. Then I pour 200 mL bottles of each of the contestant whiskeys and label them with a nonsense name. Finally, I make a separate bracket with the nonsense names and give that and the 200 mL bottles to my wife. After that, she takes care of everything. She has no idea what is in each bottle due to the nonsense name. She pours and keeps track of the winners while we do our tastings. And all I need to do is taste and write. It’s a pretty slick system.

And it means that everything is a true surprise. When we finished the final tasting and revealed who won each round, there were real surprises. It was more fun for us than when we knew who was in each tasting but didn’t know which glass was which whiskey.

So who are the participants and how did they get chosen? Well, every year I try to put in limitations that will force me to choose a new set of participants. Well, mostly new, anyway. This year I limited myself to only whiskeys that are available in handles (1.75 L bottles for those unaware of the term). Now trends in packaging have made it so that the term “handle” is not really appropriate anymore. I can’t think of a single “handle” that actually has a handle on it these days. A grip maybe, but not a handle. And many don’t even have that. But in any case, I like the shorthand of not needing to say 1.75-liter bottle.

Here are the rules that governed who was chosen. These are based on the same rules that I’ve used for most of the prior eight editions of this contest.

1. It has to be Straight Bourbon Whiskey. No blends or whatever. And if it is straight and doesn’t say it? Too bad. If the words Straight Bourbon Whiskey don’t appear on the label you are not qualified. A man needs standards after all.

2. My usual rules state that bottles need to be $15 or under for a 750 mL bottle or under $20 for a liter bottle. Following the math, that means handles need to be under $35.

3. Participants were seeded based on age and then proof. If you are over four years old, you don’t need to put the age on the label. Under that and you are required to say how old it is. If you stated the age and didn’t need you, you would get a nod. If you did it because you were required to, then someone else got the nod over you. After that, higher proof means a higher seed.

4. These were tasted completely blind. Until the final tasting was completed, neither my wife nor I had any clue what was in each bottle.

And now that we know how they got here, let’s meet the contestants under their real names. The number one overall seed is Arctic Mama otherwise known as Heaven Hill’s Evan Williams Bottled in Bond. As the highest proof entrant in the four-year-old or older age range, it gets the first seed. It starts out going against Sonic Berry aka Colonel Lee. An old brand that is now listed as being bottled by Barton Brands. It was chosen by a coin flip as one of three bottles that were three years old and 80° proof. The number two seed is the Giant Charmer, Four Roses who will be facing off against Beam Suntory’s Old Crow, aka Barrel Shakes.

Across the way in Division Two, we have Quark Juggler or Evan Williams 1783 in the number one spot facing off against Total Wine’s TerrePURE brand Winchester otherwise known as Horse Jacket. Finally, we have the most expensive entry, a bottling from IJW Whiskey, coming in one penny under the rules at $34.99 in Hamburger Arcade or McFarlane’s Reserve going up against the least expensive entry in Laird’s Banker’s Club Bourbon (Fire Pirate) which I bought for under $20 for the handle.

A lot of new faces this time. Only three have been here before in the form they are now. Evan Williams 1783 has competed previously but has undergone a proof bump and reformulation since then. This one was a lot of fun. Who you got? Any upsets that you see on the horizon? Let us know down in the comments.

View fullsize

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

Copper & Cask Single Barrel Rye, Top Ten Liquors Selection

About a month ago, I had the world’s tiniest cheese fire in my oven. A pizza had dripped a little too much and…poof, up it went. The oven hasn’t really worked correctly since. Which kinda sucks. Nothing like baking something only to hear your oven shut off halfway through.

Well, it finally kicked the bucket yesterday. I shut it off, and it lost power. Never to turn back on. Or so I hope, I hate that oven. But I spent way too much on it to want to get rid of it. But I am doing my due diligence by having a former co-worker of my wife, who happens to be an appliance repair person, come over and pronounce judgment on the soul of the stove. If it can be resurrected, yay! I don’t have to spend lots of money on a replacement. If it can’t, yay! I get rid of something I really don’t like. Either way, I’m going to be both pissed off and extremely happy.

In the meantime, I get to cook outside. My wife had me set up an outdoor kitchen last summer with a propane burner, a pellet grill, and some prep tables. Thankfully, the weather has been above freezing. It may not have been worth it to cook a box of mac n cheese outside if it had gotten too cold. Tonight I’m testing out the pellet grill as an outdoor oven for a pan of lasagna. I’m going on the assumption that using the Yoder as an outdoor oven will work just fine. Even if I do get a bit of a smoked flavor on the lasagna. So if nothing else, I’ll learn some things about my secondary kitchen setup.

If you squint a bit, you could see tonight’s whiskey in the same light. I’d gone into the store looking to grab more of the bourbon that I reviewed last week. But even though I was in the same chain, I was in a different location. I was a bit bummed until I saw this bottle of Copper & Cask Straight Rye Whiskey. It was also MGP, also a store pick, also cask strength. I mean, I was pretty sure that everything would turn out great. I love MGP 95% rye. I love it even more at cask strength. But, who knows right? I’d only had one bottle of any whiskey from the collaboration in the past, maybe that bourbon was a one-off fluke. But I picked it up anyway. If nothing else, I’d learn a bit more about the brand, the store, or both.

Copper & Cask Single Barrel Rye, Top Ten Liquors Selection

Purchase Info: $49.96 for a 750 ml bottle at Top Ten Liquor, Chanhassen, MN

Price per Drink (50 mL): $3.33

Details: 54% ABV. Barrel #: MI-136. Distilled in Lawrenceburg, IN. Filled: Dec. 2015, Bottled: Oct. 2021, 5 years old. Mash bill: 95% rye, 5% malted barley.

Nose: Cedar, mint, almond, and cinnamon.

Mouth: Spicy. Notes of cinnamon, almond, and cedar.

Finish: Warm and medium length. Notes of mint, cinnamon, and cedar.

Thoughts: Cask-strength MGP rye is very possibly my favorite pour. And this was an affordable bottle. Two great things that go great together. I really like this one. Probably not enough to go buy a case of it for the closet, but that mostly comes down to my wife not being nearly the fan of 95% rye that I am. I am hoping to grab a couple more bottles before they are out though.

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

Copper & Cask Single Barrel Bourbon, Top Ten Liquors Selection

Before we begin, I’d like to acknowledge that there are way more important things going on in the world today than talking about Bourbon. The news out of Eastern Europe is heartbreaking. And knowing that I have occasional readers from Ukraine, I just want to say that I hope you are currently, and remain safe.

Those of you who have been around the Bourbon World for a while will remember a time when Willett Family Estate Bottled Single Barrel Bourbons and Ryes were affordable, but always delicious whiskeys. They stopped being affordable so long ago now that I’m not actually sure they are still making them. When prices passed $200 in the gift shop, they fell off of my radar. But back in the day, I really enjoyed picking up a 5- or 6-year old bottle of Bourbon for $50 or less whenever I visited Kentucky. Sure it was sourced, but the people they were sourcing from make delicious whiskey. And the folks at Willett have a fantastic ability to choose delicious single barrels. Excuse me while I reminisce about the “good old days.”

Actually no. I’m of the opinion that we are still in the midst of the good old days of bourbon. Sure, the prices were lower a decade or more ago, but there was comparatively little variety. I used to be able to keep a list in my head of which bourbon was cheaper at which store. Now I have a hard time remembering all the brands that a single store carries. I mostly brought Willett up because I recently picked up a store-pick of Copper & Cask Bourbon that reminded me of those old Willett bottles.

There is very little about Copper & Cask online. The label is owned by Latitude Beverage Co. out of Rhode Island. They are an independent bottler/rectifier with an extensive wine portfolio and a few spirits brands under their belt. The bottle of bourbon I picked up was sourced from MGP in Lawrenceburg, Indiana. According to the back of the bottle, the juice inside is MGP’s 21% Rye bourbon mashbill. It is non-chill filtered and bottled at cask strength. Best of all, I got it for under $50.

This particular bottle was part of a barrel selected by Top Ten Liquors here in the Twin Cities. According to store employees, it is the best of the three barrels of bourbon that they have selected from Copper & Cask. So keep that under advisement as you read my thoughts on this particular bottle. Your mileage may vary.

Copper & Cask Single Barrel Bourbon, Top Ten Liquors Selection.

Purchase Info: $49.96 for a 750 mL bottle at Top Ten Liquors, Rosemount, MN

Price per Drink (50 mL): $3.33

Details: 56% ABV. Barrel number: MK-152. Filled June 2015, bottled October 2021, 6 years old. Mash bill: 70% Corn, 21% Rye, 9% Malted Barley.

Nose: Caramel, vanilla, almond, and wintergreen.

Mouth: Nice and spicy. Notes of caramel, vanilla, wintergreen, and almond.

Finish: Medium length and warm. Notes of cinnamon and oak.

View fullsize

Thoughts: This is so delicious that I went back and grabbed a case for the ol’ whiskey closet. It’s a very good, cask-strength MGP bourbon. And like I said, it reminds me of bottles that you could get from Willett circa 2012: top-quality sourced MGP bottled at cask strength. That’s a recipe that is darn hard to beat.

Keep in mind though, your mileage may vary, this is both a single barrel product and a store pick. I’m looking forward to finding other bottles of this in the future just to see how the quality varies.

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

Douglas & Todd Small Batch Bourbon

When I first started learning about whiskey, I got it into my head that I wanted to start a craft distillery. I tried to learn everything I could about whiskey. That learning eventually led to the creation of this site…because what else was I going to do with all that learnin’ after the impulse to start my own distillery had passed? But there was one experiment that I had envisioned way back then that has stuck with me.

I wanted to take barrels of the same distillate and age it in different regions of the country for the same length of time and then sell it as a set. Just to let consumers see the effect of the local climates on the aging of bourbon. I thought it would be a neat idea, mostly because it was a product that I would have wanted to buy.

I envisioned five areas you could have barrels aging. Of course Kentucky as a control. From there I thought somewhere near the Southeast US coastline for a hot and humid climate, maybe even with an ocean breeze since we are dreaming right now. The tour I took at the Stranahan’s distillery mentioned that because their climate is cool year-round, the pressure differentials affected the aging whiskey more than the temperature swings did. So the Rocky Mountains would be a fun addition to our set of mythical bourbons. I also think that the cool and humid climate of the Pacific Northwest would be an interesting counterpoint to the hot humid Southeast. To round out the package, and as I live here, I figured that I’d find someplace in Northern Minnesota for the cold, Canada-like climate. Each of these would bring a different set of conditions, and hopefully flavors, to the distillate.

Of course, as I didn’t have a distillery, nor did I have the capital or relationships to purchase a batch of bourbon big enough for this experiment to work, the idea has stayed an idle musing. I still think it would be interesting though. If you have the resources to try it out, send me a bottle of each when you get it finished.

The reason I bring all this up is that I happened to stumble across a bourbon that was aged four years in the Canada-like climate of Northern Minnesota. In fact, last week I talked about being open to trying the one bourbon claimed on the Phillips Distilling website. This is that bourbon.

At launch in 2018, Douglass & Todd was a collaboration between Panther Distillery and Phillips Distilling Company. Though I’m not too sure how official that collaboration is anymore. The Phillips website has the following to say about the bourbon:

Douglas & Todd is a small batch, handcrafted, straight bourbon born and raised on the unforgiving plains of Minnesota. Our bourbon is aged a minimum of four hard years in handmade oak barrels that provide D&T its distinctive character. Distilled and rested in two historic counties at the first craft distillery in Minnesota, Douglas & Todd was built to be a bourbon drinker's bourbon.

Panther Distillery says that they were Minnesota’s first craft distillery. And there is a cheeky statement on their products page stating “We have another product available but due to trademark laws we are unable to have the product displayed here. Be on the lookout at your local liquor store for our mystery product!” So there’s that. But of course, what anyone says about a product isn’t nearly as important as how that product tastes. So, let's dig in.

Douglas & Todd Small Batch Bourbon

Purchase Info: $29.99 for a 750 mL bottle at Village Liquor, Prior Lake, MN

Price per Drink (50mL): $2.00

Details: 4 years old. 46.5% ABV.

Nose: Grain forward on the nose with notes of candied fruit and faint hints of mint and caramel.

Mouth: Thin in the mouth with notes of grain, mint, and baking spice.

Finish: Medium length and warm. Notes of dried grain, candied fruit, and cinnamon.

Thoughts: This is a meh bourbon that has the bones to have been really good. It still tastes really young. The Northern Minnesota climate is much closer to that of Winnipeg—where they age the whisky for decades—than that of Louisville where four-year-old whiskey is mature and perfectly drinkable. Though I think it could have spent many more years in the barrel, it isn't terrible. This bottle will get consumed. Might be in a cocktail or a home blend, but it isn't one that I'll be dumping out. Unlike its cousin Cooper’s Mark which has already been introduced to my kitchen sink.

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, posters, and more.

Fistful of Bourbon

Back when I was first starting to get into whiskey, I was interested in trying it all. I wanted to learn the differences between the styles. I wanted to find my favorites in each style. I wanted to learn it all. Unfortunately, I quickly found out that I really didn't like most of the Scotch whiskey that I was trying. I used to say something like “It’s not that I don’t like Scotch, I just haven’t found the ones I like yet.” Well since I haven’t found it over a decade later, I’m thinking it might be time to admit that as a general rule, I don’t like Scotch whiskey. More for the folks that do, I guess.

However while I was still trying to learn everything about all styles of whiskey, I did pick up on a few of the names of the various producers of whiskey from around the world. One of those that stuck in my head was William Grant & Sons. They are the makers of Scotch whiskies Glenfiddich and the Balvenie, the Irish whiskey Tullamore Dew, Sailor Jerry Spiced Rum, Hendrick’s Gin and other brands across spirit types. All of which require expertise in blending, either spirits or flavors.

So it was with interest that I heard the 2018 news that William Grant & Sons was launching their own bourbon brand, Fistful of Bourbon. I wanted to see what a big company that had built their business on blending could do using bourbon. Until recently, one of the unsung portions of the bourbon industry was the blender. Though that is starting to change. Slowly. Most of the old bourbon companies still don’t like to use the term blend, whether as a noun or as a verb, due to the quirks of US law surrounding that particular term when it comes to whiskey. And it isn’t like William Grant & Sons didn’t have experience with American Whiskey, they bought Tuthilltown Spirits, makers of the Hudson Whiskey brand, in 2017.

And then I read the reviews at launch. The nicest one I remember said it was bland. There were others that were worse. So I initially passed. As much as I like letting everyone know what to avoid, I’d still have to find something to do with the rest of the bottle if I didn’t like it. Even a guy who takes photos of bottles or glasses of bourbon every week can only use so much prop whiskey. But then my wife noticed last month that our local liquor store had 50 mL bottles of Fistful of Bourbon on sale for ninety-nine cents each. For two dollars, I could ignore the reviews and find out for myself without risking the need to dump out a $25 bottle of bourbon.

Fistful of Bourbon

Purchase Info: $0.99 each for two 50 mL bottles at Viking Liquor Barrel, Prior Lake, MN

Price per Drink (50 mL): $0.99

Details: "A Blend of Straight Bourbon Whiskies Aged a Minimum of 2 Years." 45% ABV.

Nose: Grain-forward. Delicate bubblegum and mint notes.

Mouth: Light in flavor with a thin mouthfeel. Bubblegum, cinnamon, and dried grains.

Finish: Short and sweet. Notes of dried grain and cinnamon.

Thoughts: This is very grain-forward. What's there tastes fine, there just isn't very much there. If this were a Canadian Whisky, I'd say that it could be the starting base of a nice blend once they add the flavoring whisky to it. As a bourbon, however? It's ok, I guess. I'd rate it very meh.

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, posters, and more.