10th Annual BourbonGuy.com Brackets: Round 1: Wolcott Bottled-in-Bond vs. Jack Daniel's Bonded

Here we go! Let’s get down to the competitions.  I hope that you guys are as excited by this as I am. Round 1 of the 2023 BourbonGuy.com Brackets opens with Division 1 Number 2 seed Wolcott Bottled-in-Bond versus Number 3 seed Jack Daniel’s Bonded. 

Wolcott Bottled-in-Bond is a Total Wine “Spirits Direct” brand. It was distilled in Bardstown, KY at distillery DSP-KY-12, better known as Sazerac’s Barton 1792 distillery. It was bottled in Frankfort, KY at distillery DSP-KY-113, otherwise known as Sazerac’s Buffalo Trace distillery. Though it is a Total Wine exclusive, it was purchased at Viking Liquor Barrel in Prior Lake, MN. It cost $46.97 for a 750 mL bottle or $3.13 per pour.

And their opponent is a relative newcomer to store shelves, having only been launched last year. Jack Daniel’s Bonded is a bottled-in-bond version of the iconic Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey. It has two distillery plant numbers on it, DSP-TN-1 and DSP-TN-4, both of which are part of the Jack Daniel’s Lynchburg, TN campus. This was purchased at Viking Liquor Barrel in Prior Lake, MN. It cost $34.99 for a 700 mL bottle or $2.50 per pour.

All of the competitions this year were tasted blind and we knew the winner of the competition prior to any reveal. Notes, thoughts, and conclusions were all from before we knew what was what. Needless to say, some of my conclusions were surprising to me. Tasting notes may be a little unusual since they were being tasted at the same time and could have influenced the perceptions of one another.

Whiskey A (Wolcott Bottled in Bond)

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $3.13

Details: 50% ABV.

Nose: Nutty with notes of mint and dusty oak.

Mouth: Bready, with notes of almond, cinnamon, caramel.

Finish: Medium length with notes of cinnamon, bubblegum, almonds.

Whiskey B (Jack Daniel’s Bonded)

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $2.50

Details: 50% ABV.

Nose: Chocolate, caramel, vanilla, and cinnamon.

Mouth: Chocolate, cinnamon, and caramel.

Finish: Medium length with notes of caramel rolls, cinnamon, and mint.

Thoughts:

Pre-Reveal Thoughts: "B" is much spicier in the mouth. It is also much richer and much sweeter. "A" is pretty good, but the richness of "B" puts it over the top.

Post-Reveal Thoughts: Honestly, I had no idea what to expect from Wolcott. Knowing it is a bonded bourbon, I knew there wouldn’t be any “funny” business going on with it. But I had no idea how it would taste. I like a lot of Bourbons that come out of Barton 1792, but I also find a lot of the stuff they do for store brands to be kinda meh. Not good, but not terrible. And that is kind of how it worked out here. Jack Daniel’s Bonded was very good. Wolcott Bottled-in-Bond was meh. This was an easy choice.

Winner: Jack Daniel’s Bonded is advancing to round 2.

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

Kirkland Bottled-in-Bond Bourbon by Barton 1792 Master Distillers

I realized today that since I got a Costco membership that I’ve become one of those people that buys a lot of stuff at Costco. I mean it is hard not to. You go in there, you grab one of the giant, multi-level carts, and you toss giant quantities of items in there. As a person who smokes meat, I particularly like their meat selection. But I usually also have to check out their liquor selection too. In many states, it is inside the main store, but Minnesota forces retailers to have a separate area with a separate entrance for their liquor store.

You might ask why that is. Well there is an easy answer. Culturally, Minnesotans do not like liquor. It was our Congress-critter one Andrew Volstead that introduced the National Prohibition Act that kicked off Prohibition. And until recently any place that sold beer that was higher than 3.2% alcohol had to be closed on Sunday. Hence the separate entrances. Now don’t get me wrong, much like our cousins to the east in Wisconsin, Minnesotans drink a lot. But culturally we feel bad about it and judge those who seem to cross the lines of what we consider to be overindulging.

But we were talking about Costco, not the historical cultural hangups of my adopted home state.

Even though I find it near impossible to walk out of Costco without having spent a couple of hundred dollars, if you plan things right it does save you a bit of money. Especially on items to stock your pantry, meat, and liquor. Most especially on their Kirkland branded liquor, like tonight’s Bottled-in-Bond bourbon. $25 per liter. It’s hard to beat that. At least if it tastes good. But having had a couple other Kirkland Bourbons by Barton 1792, I’m going to tell you up front that this one is just as good as the other two. Maybe better.

Kirkland Bottled-in-Bond Bourbon by Barton 1792 Master Distillers

Purchase Info: Roughly $25 per liter. I tossed the receipt so I don’t know exactly how many pennies below $25 they went on this.

Price per drink (50 mL): $1.25

Details: 50% ABV. Distilled at D.S.P.-KY-12.

Nose: Caramel, vanilla, almond, and oak.

Mouth: Honey, caramel, vanilla, almond, cinnamon red hots, and oak.

Finish: Medium length and warm. Notes of oak and cinnamon red hots.

Thoughts: This is a killer "everyday" bourbon. Good sweetness and spice. The honey note is delicious. There is just enough oak to keep me happy. I liked this enough that I went back the next day and bought four more bottles. I'm glad I did. The shelf was full when I bought my first bottle and there were six bottles left when I went back the next day. I was nice enough to leave two for the next person.

After having three different of these Barton/Kirkland collaborations, I think I've learned my lesson. It's Costco... buy in bulk the first time. It’s looking like a recession out there, kids. Let’s save ourselves some money by buying good quality, inexpensive products.

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, posters, and more.

Thomas S. Moore Extended Cask Finish Bourbons, 2022: Part 2

I’d like to thank the folks at Sazerac for providing these review samples with no strings attached.

View fullsize

This is the second part of a two-part series. In part one we discussed background information on the Thomas S. Moore line and reviewed the Merlot Cask and Cognac Cask versions. Tonight we are going to pick up where we left off by diving into the two bourbons that were finished in fortified wine casks.

Fortified wine is a style of wine that has had a distilled spirit, often brandy, added to it. Styles you may have heard of include Port, Marsala, Vermouth, and the ones we are interested in for tonight’s whiskeys: Sherry and Madeira. So what are Sherry and Madeira?

Sherry is a fortified wine made in the area near Cádiz, Spain. If you are a Scotch drinker, you’ll know that Sherry casks are often used for aging that style of Whiskey. Along with used Bourbon barrels of course. It probably isn’t surprising to find Bourbon producers following along with that practice. My main use for Sherry is in cooking. I have recipes for Sherried Potatoes and a Sherry Cake that I love.

Madeira is a fortified wine made on the Portuguese island of, you guessed it, Madeira. It is a bit less common in America today than it was in the past. Pre-Revolutionary War America was awash in Madeira. It was very possibly their favorite alcoholic beverage. In fact, George Washington was such a fan that he had copious amounts brought on campaign with him in the War. And he ended up enjoying it the rest of his life, literally on his deathbed. According to Atlas Obscura, the style ended up falling out of favor rather quickly after the War when the Federal government tried to pay off the war debts by levying a high import tax on it.

So now that we know a little about the finishing barrels, let’s see how these taste!

Thomas S. Moore Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey Finished in Madeira Casks

Purchase Info: This sample was graciously provided by the distillery for review purposes. The suggested retail price is $69.99

Price per Drink (50 mL): $4.67

Details: 48.25% ABV. A variety of different types of Madeira barrels were used.

Nose: Caramel, vanilla, oak, and a faint note of lemon zest. After a few minutes "husky" notes of sandalwood and crème brûlée take over.

Mouth: The adjective that first popped into my head was "Round.” There are no sharp edges to this. Notes of cinnamon, crème brûlée, and oak.

Finish: Medium to long. Notes of caramel, citrus zest, vanilla, and cinnamon.

Thoughts: Sweet with a well-integrated influence from the fortified wine. It's quite lovely. I'm really enjoying it.

---

Thomas S. Moore Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey Finished in Sherry Casks

Purchase Info: This sample was graciously provided by the distillery for review purposes. The suggested retail price is $69.99

Price per Drink (50 mL): $4.67

Details: 49.35% ABV. The Sherry casks used previously held Oloroso Sherry.

Nose: Caramel alternating with butterscotch, nutmeg, and fresh mint.

Mouth: Caramel, chocolate, coffee, and bright cinnamon.

Finish: Medium in both warmth and length. Notes of caramel and coffee linger.

Thoughts: This reminds me so much of a fancy caramel coffee drink or a high-end caramel coated in dark chocolate and sea salt. It's delicious. Big fan!

Thoughts on the entire line: I'd buy any one of these. Sure, they have a different flavor than straight bourbon, but that's kinda the point. Bourbon with a bit of "something else" to complement it. And these finishes all complement the bourbon flavor very nicely. Which is something you can't always say about other finished bourbons. All of these are tasty, well-integrated spins on the traditional bourbon flavor profile.

Like I said earlier, I'd buy any one of these. If forced to choose, I'd go with the Sherry Cask. I'm really digging the candy/ coffee thing it has going on.

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

Thomas S. Moore Extended Cask Finish Bourbons, 2022: Part 1

I’d like to thank the folks at Sazerac for providing these review samples with no strings attached.

View fullsize

Back in late 2020, Sazerac released the first “ultra-premium brand” from the Barton 1792 Distillery. It was named Thomas S. Moore to honor the man who built the distillery that is now known as Barton 1792. It was, and still is, a line-up of bourbons that were aged for five to six years and then placed in a finishing barrel for somewhere between one to four additional years. Quoting the press release (2022 edition):

To create these whiskeys, Barton 1792’s signature high rye recipe bourbon was aged for five to six years in new charred oak barrels before filling other casks that previously matured various wines or spirits from around the world. These whiskeys are then left to age an additional one to four years. This extended cask-finishing method results in elegant whiskeys, each displaying a distinct flavor profile, reflecting nuances of both the bourbon and the finishing cask.

The initial release featured Port, Chardonnay, and Cabernet Sauvignon finishes. Well, Thomas S. Moore is back for 2022 with a new set of finishes. These include two versions that have been finished in fortified wine barrels (Madeira and Sherry), one version that has been finished in Cognac barrels, and one that was finished in Merlot wine barrels. Back in early 2021 when I reviewed the initial releases, I thought it was an interesting concept that actually performed better than I had anticipated that it would. As such, I was excited when Sazerac announced that they were going to be releasing a new batch. And even happier when they agreed to send me a taste of each of them so that I could let you know if they were worth buying.

Tonight we will be looking at two of the four as I didn’t want this to get too long. The second set will come in Part 2.

Thomas S. Moore Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey Finished in Merlot Casks

Purchase Info: This sample was graciously provided by the distillery for review purposes. The suggested retail price is $69.99

Price per Drink (50 mL): $4.67

Details: 46.65% ABV. The merlot barrels are from wineries in the Napa and Sonoma areas.

Nose: Oak, cinnamon, red fruits, and a touch of mint.

Mouth: Strong wine presence on the initial sip which fades to the background in subsequent sips. Lots of cinnamon and oak after the wine fades.

Finish: Long and not too warm. Very flavorful. Strong notes of Cinnamon, ginger, nutmeg, and oak.

Thoughts: I don't care for wine-finished bourbons generally. So when I got the strong wine presence on my initial sip, I was worried. I shouldn't have been. After that initial sip, this is full of bright and lively baking spice notes. Which are very tasty. I like this one. Surprisingly. I had guessed that I wouldn't.

---

Thomas S. Moore Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey Finished in Cognac Casks

Purchase Info: This sample was graciously provided by the distillery for review purposes. The suggested retail price is $69.99

Price per Drink (50 mL): $4.67

Details: 46.7% ABV. The cognac barrels used generally held cognac for six or more years previously.

Nose: Brown sugar, oak, and nutmeg.

Mouth: Dry with vibrant spice. Notes of nutmeg, cinnamon, brown sugar, vanilla, and a mild—but noticeable—Cognac influence.

Finish: On the shorter side of medium. A burst of cinnamon that fades relatively quickly.

Thoughts: This one has a subtle influence from its finishing barrel. If I was handed this blind, I'm not sure I would have known it was barrel finished. That said, it is delicious. Vibrant is the first word that came to mind and it stuck with me throughout the tasting.

As stated above, check out part 2 for the Madeira and Sherry Cask Finished editions.

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

Bottom-Shelf Brackets 2022: Round 1: Evan Williams Bottled in Bond vs. Colonel Lee

Tonight we feature a fan favorite in Heaven Hill’s Evan Williams Bottled in Bond against a bourbon that has been considered and rejected multiple times for the competition. Colonel Lee is a bourbon that currently says it is “Bottled by Barton Distilling Company.” They do not list this brand on any of the Sazerac websites though apparently, it isn’t a new brand. This is either going to be a pleasant surprise or ass-whooping. Let’s see how it goes.

First up is our overall number one seed. Coming in at 100° proof, at least four years old, and the product of one distilling, please welcome: Evan Williams Bottled in Bond who is competing under the random, yet oddly appropriate, name of Arctic Mama.

And its opponent, who is looking so striking in an orange suit and competing under the name Sonic Berry, please welcome: Colonel Lee!

Reminder, all of the competitions this year were tasted blind and we knew the winner of the competition prior to any reveal. Notes, thoughts, and conclusions were all from before we knew what was what. Needless to say, some of my conclusions were surprising to me. Tasting notes may be a little unusual since they were being tasted at the same time and could have influenced the perceptions of one another.

Arctic Mama (Evan Williams Bottled in Bond)

Purchase Info: $28.49 for a 1.75-liter bottle, Total Wine, Burnsville, MN

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $0.81

Details: 50% ABV.

Nose: Mint, nutmeg, and honey

Mouth: Honey, mint, nutmeg, caramel, and cinnamon.

Finish: Medium length and warmth. Notes of butterscotch and oatmeal.

Thoughts:  That's pretty good.

Sonic Berry (Colonel Lee)

Purchase Info: $21.97 for a 1.75-liter bottle, Viking Liquor Barrel, Prior Lake, MN

Price Per Drink (50 mL): $0.63

Details: 40% ABV. Aged 36 months.

Nose: Mint, dried grain, and an unpleasant earthy note.

Mouth: Fermented grain and mint.

Finish: Short but warm. Heavy on dried grain.

Thoughts: This is unpleasant. It will probably be dumped when we are finished.

Winner: From the first hint of Sonic Berry's nose, I knew Arctic Mama was the winner. Arctic Mama tastes like bourbon. Sonic Mama tastes like too many shots, hangovers, and bad decisions that you can't quite remember in the morning. Arctic Mama (Evan Williams Bottled in Bond) advances to round 2.

View fullsize

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

9th Annual BourbonGuy.com Bottom-Shelf Brackets: The Handles (Without Handles) Edition

Arctic Mama versus Sonic Berry? Quark Juggler versus Horse Jacket? Hamburger Arcade?

Eric, have you lost your damn fool mind? What kind of nonsense are you spewing?

Well, I thought that this year I’d give you a peek behind the curtain as to how we do these brackets every year. We used to do an entire convoluted routine so that we could both have a blind tasting. It involved people leaving the room. Pieces of paper. Cyphers. It was very confusing, and if you made a mistake (or just needed more whiskey to help you make a decision) there was no way to recreate what happened.

But nowadays, we have an ever so simple process. I seed the whiskey in the bracket. Then I pour 200 mL bottles of each of the contestant whiskeys and label them with a nonsense name. Finally, I make a separate bracket with the nonsense names and give that and the 200 mL bottles to my wife. After that, she takes care of everything. She has no idea what is in each bottle due to the nonsense name. She pours and keeps track of the winners while we do our tastings. And all I need to do is taste and write. It’s a pretty slick system.

And it means that everything is a true surprise. When we finished the final tasting and revealed who won each round, there were real surprises. It was more fun for us than when we knew who was in each tasting but didn’t know which glass was which whiskey.

So who are the participants and how did they get chosen? Well, every year I try to put in limitations that will force me to choose a new set of participants. Well, mostly new, anyway. This year I limited myself to only whiskeys that are available in handles (1.75 L bottles for those unaware of the term). Now trends in packaging have made it so that the term “handle” is not really appropriate anymore. I can’t think of a single “handle” that actually has a handle on it these days. A grip maybe, but not a handle. And many don’t even have that. But in any case, I like the shorthand of not needing to say 1.75-liter bottle.

Here are the rules that governed who was chosen. These are based on the same rules that I’ve used for most of the prior eight editions of this contest.

1. It has to be Straight Bourbon Whiskey. No blends or whatever. And if it is straight and doesn’t say it? Too bad. If the words Straight Bourbon Whiskey don’t appear on the label you are not qualified. A man needs standards after all.

2. My usual rules state that bottles need to be $15 or under for a 750 mL bottle or under $20 for a liter bottle. Following the math, that means handles need to be under $35.

3. Participants were seeded based on age and then proof. If you are over four years old, you don’t need to put the age on the label. Under that and you are required to say how old it is. If you stated the age and didn’t need you, you would get a nod. If you did it because you were required to, then someone else got the nod over you. After that, higher proof means a higher seed.

4. These were tasted completely blind. Until the final tasting was completed, neither my wife nor I had any clue what was in each bottle.

And now that we know how they got here, let’s meet the contestants under their real names. The number one overall seed is Arctic Mama otherwise known as Heaven Hill’s Evan Williams Bottled in Bond. As the highest proof entrant in the four-year-old or older age range, it gets the first seed. It starts out going against Sonic Berry aka Colonel Lee. An old brand that is now listed as being bottled by Barton Brands. It was chosen by a coin flip as one of three bottles that were three years old and 80° proof. The number two seed is the Giant Charmer, Four Roses who will be facing off against Beam Suntory’s Old Crow, aka Barrel Shakes.

Across the way in Division Two, we have Quark Juggler or Evan Williams 1783 in the number one spot facing off against Total Wine’s TerrePURE brand Winchester otherwise known as Horse Jacket. Finally, we have the most expensive entry, a bottling from IJW Whiskey, coming in one penny under the rules at $34.99 in Hamburger Arcade or McFarlane’s Reserve going up against the least expensive entry in Laird’s Banker’s Club Bourbon (Fire Pirate) which I bought for under $20 for the handle.

A lot of new faces this time. Only three have been here before in the form they are now. Evan Williams 1783 has competed previously but has undergone a proof bump and reformulation since then. This one was a lot of fun. Who you got? Any upsets that you see on the horizon? Let us know down in the comments.

View fullsize

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.

Kirkland Signature Single Barrel Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey

I know almost nothing about Costco. I have never had a membership. I’ve been in the liquor section of the location closest to me exactly one time. In fact, about the only thing I do know about the company is that their house brand is Kirkland.

So it was a bit strange when I went to my local mom and pop liquor store and saw a liter of Kirkland Bourbon on the shelf. Of course, I know that there is a Minnesota law that forbids store-exclusive liquor brands. But this has usually played out with the Total Wine Spirits Direct brands landing on the shelves of local stores. This is the first time that I’ve seen a Costco brand in the wild.

So like I said, I know next to nothing about Costco. But, unlike the Total Wine brands, I do know something about the Costco bourbon. Namely who made it. Emblazoned at the top of the label are the words “by Barton 1792.” I love this. In fact, it was what made me pick up the bottle we are talking about tonight. I really like the bourbon that comes out of the Barton 1792 distillery and I liked that they were willing to put their name on the barrels that they sold to someone else.

The usual practice in the US, for what would be termed “independent bottlers” in other countries, is for a company to source their bourbon from a distillery who then makes them sign an non-disclosure agreement about where they got it. In other words, they didn’t want their name associated with the bourbon for one reason or another. It is speculation on my part that this was, at least in part, because they were either selling a product that was non-standard for their house style or because that it was a product that wasn’t necessarily their best. Like I said, speculation on my part, but when someone doesn’t want their name on a product, what else are you supposed to think? I mean it could be that the supplier doesn’t want someone trading in on their good name, but if they are getting paid either way and they are selling decent stuff, is it really that bad?

No idea, I write for tips on the internet and they run multi-million dollar corporations. It is possible that they understand these things better than I do. But that said, I still picked up the Kirkland Signature by Barton 1792 and not one of many other NDP-produced bourbons that fill the shelves.

Kirkland Signature Single Barrel Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey by Barton 1792

Purchase Info: $33.99 for a 1 liter bottle at Viking Liquor Barrel, Prior Lake, MN.

Price per Drink (50 mL): $1.70

Details: 60% ABV. Non-Chill Filtered.

Nose: Caramel, vanilla, almond, oak, light fruit.

Mouth: Damn, that's hot! Nutmeg, almond, toffee, mint, and oak.

Finish: Medium length and warm. Toffee, almond, and mint.

Thoughts: Is this a world-beater? No. But, it tastes good, it's high proof, and it is only $1.70 per pour. Let's just say that I went back to the store to grab a few more liters of this before I posted the review. This is a great everyday bourbon that also happens to also be overproof. I'm a fan. It is tasty enough to use in cocktails or cooking and inexpensive enough that I don’t mind using it that way. Plus as I said, I love the transparency on who made it. Right on the front label. Even bigger fan of that.

If you are in Minnesota and see this at your local, pick it up. If you are anywhere else and have a Costco membership you should consider doing the same.

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, posters, and more.

Bottom-Shelf Brackets 2021: The Championship Rounds

Well, here we are again. Once again we’ve nearly made it to the end of the Bottom-Shelf Brackets competition. I hope everyone was playing along. And if not, that you’ve had enough of these to play along in your mind. It really is a fun exercise each year to sit down and pit inexpensive bourbons against each other. I say inexpensive instead of “bad” because there isn’t one of these that will be dumped out when this is done. I will use every one in some way or another. Either neat on its own, in a cocktail, or even as the base of a blend. They are all good bourbons, some are just better than others in my opinion. You’re welcome to form your own opinions as to whether I’m right.

But anyway, let’s get on to round two and see who advances. Both of these matchups feature a 1-seed versus a 2-seed. There haven’t been any upsets so far. Let’s see if that continues.

Round 2a: Whiskey 1 (Ezra Brooks) vs. Whiskey 2 (Evan Williams)

Thoughts: Very similar on the nose. Both are decent on the mouth. Vibrant cinnamon spice in each. The finish of #1 shows peanut where #2 Shows a zesty spice. #2 wins on the strength of a nicer and tastier finish.

Round 2b: Whiskey 1 (Very Old Barton) vs. Whiskey 2 (Wild Turkey)

Thoughts: Once again the nose on each of these is similar with only slight differences to delicate notes. So the nose is a push. #1 has a nice mouthfeel with citrusy notes to go with the spicy notes. #2 was a little thin at first with a blossom of flavor after a few seconds in the mouth. Lots of baking spice notes in that blossoming. The finish is nice on both this time. I think I need to go with #2, but it is really close.

View fullsize

I’m not going to lie, I was very surprised to find out that Wild Turkey and Evan Wiliams won their rounds. As I stated above, we hadn’t had an upset yet and it was surprising to find not one, but two when all of the names were revealed at the end. I was especially surprised that the lower proof entry won each time.

Let’s see who our winner is.

Championship Round: Whiskey 1 (Evan Williams) vs. Whiskey 2 (Wild Turkey)

Whiskey #1: Mint, cinnamon, citrus zest. Not too hot, but not bland. Tasty finish.

Whiskey #2: Sweeter. Brown sugar, baking spices. Spicier but a little rough in its spice by comparison.

Winner: #1 wins this one. Once again very close but #1 has a touch more complexity.

View fullsize

If you could have seen my face as we revealed which alphanumeric code was which bourbon, you wold have laughed. I went into this fully expecting Very Old Barton to win. I mean it had won previously, right? The fact that it didn’t even make it out of Round 2 caused my jaw to drop. And it dropped even further when I saw it had been beaten by one that I said probably wouldn’t win against stiffer competition just the round prior.

But the biggest shock of all was Evan Williams winning it all. I know that a lot of you saw that coming. But I certainly didn’t. Which is weird since I know that Evan Williams is good bourbon. Due to the nature of the need for content on the site, I almost never buy it. But it is good stuff. And super inexpensive as well. It just goes to show that even those of us who have been tasting bourbon for a lot of years have our biases and preconceived notions.

And to be honest, it is fitting that Evan Williams won. I started this series of posts talking about “Finding Joy in the Ordinary.” And Evan Williams could be the patron saint of ordinary bourbon. Notice I said ordinary, not bad, bourbon. Evan Williams is good, plentiful, inexpensive and available in multiple styles and proof levels. I couldn’t have planned a more thematically accurate winner. I think that’s pretty cool.

---

Did you enjoy this post? If so, maybe you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee in return. Go to ko-fi.com/bourbonguy to support. And thank you, BourbonGuy.com is solely supported via your generosity.

Of course, if you want to support BourbonGuy.com and get a little something back in return, you can always head over to BourbonGuyGifts.com and purchase some merch. I’ve made tasting journals, stickers, pins, and more.